This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] HVM and WIndows NT

To: Alexandre CABROL PERALES <alexandre.cabrol@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] HVM and WIndows NT
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:38:59 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:38:00 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A7B0D81.8090806@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C6A0C7D1.11868%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A7B0D81.8090806@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Alexandre CABROL PERALES wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Maybe critical point on stdvga=0 is in xend.log
> [2009-08-06 19:39:53 4748] WARNING (image:495) domain winnt01: device
> model failure: pid 5858: died due to signal 8; see
> /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-winnt01.log
> [2009-08-06 19:39:53 4748] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:1877) Domain has
> crashed: name=winnt01 id=4.
> line 3328
> and in qemu-dm-winnt01.log
> I/O request not ready: 0, ptr: 0, port: e9, data: 43, count: 1, size: 1
> vga s->lfb_addr = f1000000 s->lfb_end = f1400000
> line 17

Is this the qemu log message of your failed xen 3.4 test?
It seems that you are using stdvga=1 because the line:

vga s->lfb_addr = f1000000 s->lfb_end = f1400000

is only printed when stdvga is used instead of cirrus.

If the qemu log you posted are not the right ones, could you please do
another test with stdvga=0 and send the qemu logs on the list?

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>