This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] [pvops-dom0] Adding MCA logging support in pv_ops

To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [pvops-dom0] Adding MCA logging support in pv_ops
From: "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:48:57 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "jeremy@xxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:51:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200908061049.41432.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098402CDF6599F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098402CE0B5E01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200908060927.05183.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> <200908061049.41432.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcoWcukGJNW+OiG7S8miw9Wc02MFCQAjQgMg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [pvops-dom0] Adding MCA logging support in pv_ops
Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> As for the union structure for recovery action, since no one is
>>> using it now,I plan firstly to add a comment on it, something like
>>> "If more than one kind of recovery action perbank permited, union
>>> structure need to be changed". How do you think about it?
>> That's fine with me. Tnx.
> Ah wait! I should drink some coffee and then start to think. :)
> The way you think is not how multiple actions per bank work.
> By design support for multiple actions per bank is available via
> getting multiple recovery actions in the mc_data returned from the
> fetch hypercall. The comment should mention that.
Oh, we remember the discussion before. Yes, if multiple recovery
actions needed, the fetch hypercall could return mcinfo_recovery data array. 
I will modify the comments:)

Thanks a lot!
Xen-devel mailing list