| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to
This doesn't look too bad, given the current vpt interface we have. My main
comment is regarding vpit_vcpu(), vrtc_vcpu() and vhpet.vcpu. Seems all of
these could unconditionally use i8259_target. I suggest also introducing
vhpet_vcpu(), and then pointing all three *_vcpu() macros at
pt_i8259_target() only. And get rid of the vhpet.vcpu field.
Would that work okay?
-- Keir
On 03/07/2009 05:27, "Kouya Shimura" <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch is needed for kexec/kdump since kdump may halt VCPU#0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0., Kouya Shimura
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0.,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0., Kouya Shimura
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0., Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0., Kouya Shimura
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86, hvm: cleanup hpet.c as well as i8254.c or rtc.c, Kouya Shimura
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0, Kouya Shimura
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
| |
|
Home