WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / success with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops do

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg / success with 2.6.30-rc3 pv_ops dom0
From: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:23:40 -0400
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:24:09 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RM9dsKuZj+mzzpI9qE8dFKkWWtHWzBCXbVyfOqmtG4s=; b=g54BK4x0xP4riiNsgISnYgF7FyilHL3WxPPyALYZfoaQtKE9NFDowvlq5zlQD/ou17 h3ts6FYN6K6ThKAoOUJhVPOmAEQdftgDdLXgux+PHZCYSV0KAQR1h56gGhR1bDJ9MIr3 EH5D0IVfApGmaN0ZwhQ7AEUYWyD6f9tcD4kxk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=cfvb+d7gKPENfalR1hBpnCdZ0rw5QdRuFx8dI0AJBSeglB64zONOc2Pfaa/f3kTZmO 0QENA5Toqt+5JYghyt1TBS1YVM0LbAQfbIMrYwhUbGBN2Y15uvQhsQ2XPCP+VIG23mni 6jPng78MVLgEjsg7pQhHGzqDKaliNcs0Jw6s4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A37F308.6090202@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1244218353.27370.216.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A2E9BC3.4060507@xxxxxxxx> <1244710938.27370.502.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1244711914.27370.511.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090611182709.GV24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090611193437.GX24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1245060197.27370.618.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090615102128.GB24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1245148525.5862.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A37F308.6090202@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please check the other thread titled "pvops bug". I ran into issues without HT (on a core-2 quad machine). My crude fix as well as Ian's crude patch, both serializing unpin pte call avoids crash. I can look into it once I find time. If you have any clue, I can try earlier.

-dulloor

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/16/09 03:35, Ian Campbell wrote:
Interesting in the light of a comment from Ingo Molnar this morning on
LKML:
 
Plus this system is an old P4 HyperThreading dual-socket system:
pretty much the only thing HyperThreading is good for on that box is
finding SMP races: that CPU can (and will) yield between
hyperthreads on arbitrary instruction boundaries - opening up races
wide open.
   

Yes, I was wondering if HT could be a factor here.  My test server is HT, but I run it 64-bit...


   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>