WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: tmem 32-on-64 needs (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem cleanup)

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: tmem 32-on-64 needs (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem cleanup)
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:42:59 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:43:33 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A375D770200007800005DA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcnuTx/is8i7HV6ZTkCGpUARqRtiygABvHoQ
Thread-topic: tmem 32-on-64 needs (Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem cleanup)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515
On 16/06/2009 07:53, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> first wanted to see if there's anything that I'm overlooking.
>> 
>> I can't think of anything you might be overlooking.
>> Do you want me to submit the patch or do you already
>> have one underway?
> 
> I have one halfway ready - what would be nice is if the linux side patch
> could be delayed until the adjustment is in place (and preferably until
> Keir afterwards sync-ed over the public headers), so there would not
> be temporary build breakage.

If unions are going to be de-anonymised etc I think it makes sense to delay
until the interface changes are made.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel