This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:59:04 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1240649906; bh=jyVjXTaD4KNC8E0xIWIJ63zTYz/3Z7ANQMDhjnVDBMc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KRTdGl+695v0B6A1pWPGZSbs1qDyFuVgic2z7KFLyETpTuqcxfK5GN8oJ4T5MOg2w0N+7xgS2L5w+Yi+MMLU4IZ7EmYDDRCDEmRqPy34EdZoXrcuGlwt0ygoI6ZhQIr9WNo27aoHpyn5/u9NdT4DAL7XvMdq+oP61+rnFUrtGvA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WQg1nxi1VcD+4cyVlBgkqej4edoniXBipesCUtjnuDB0uTEkmte5rYhZCUJvaGSFt+uPRXRWoPrWr03u1VEZ2n5n+jpqi3anSwda97m/di4y1Nxyt48h1FqpLu1TdSG3+UuG4KUhsGV3wlqzz0PaNDl7BS+XwG4HJKhwt+luo+o=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090425081944.GX24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The most recent boards have integrated Gigabit Ethernet Adapters on
PCI-E as usual. My preference for Linux  is Marvel Yukon 8056 PCI-E.
It's customers's decision what board to purchase and what OS to install.
I am just supposed to fix bug , either left customer on his own.


--- On Sat, 4/25/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx>, "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, April 25, 2009, 4:19 AM

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:55:19PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Chris,
> I have to apologize. Turning off segmentation offloading may work as well.
> Just now it fixed VNC issue on bare metal - CentOS 5.2 with Atansic
> Ethernet driver (ASUS P5KR) . I gonna try it at DomUs at my earliest

Have you tried another NICs? It could be a bug in the driver for that NIC..

-- Pasi

> Boris.
> --- On Fri, 4/24/09, Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
> To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx, "Xen-devel"
<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Campbell"
> Date: Friday, April 24, 2009, 6:39 PM
> Hi Jeremy,
> > > In meantime time i see, that 2.6.30-rc3&rc2&rc1-tip
> affected.
> > > Solution is the same as on Solaris xVM Linux DomUs about one
> > > year ago - is to disable checksum (nothing else) offloading at
> Linux
> > > DomUs ( CentOS 5.3, Ubuntu 9.04)
> > >
> > > /usr/local/sbin/ethtool -K etho tx off
> >
> > OK, that's a good lead.
> Yes, I've been seeing this too (and meant to investigate it before
> claiming there's abug) and I can confirm that turning off segmentation
> offloading "cures" the problem here too.
> Now the tcpdump on Dom0 looks interesting. It repeatedly sees a packet
> with 2880 byte from DomU coming in, which is then dropped and ICMP
> "fragmentation needed" sent back, the DomU resends a 1440 byte
> (after some delay), which then goes through, but then the next one is a
> 2880 byte one again, and so on.
> FYI: My Dom0 is running NAT, in case this is relevant.
> Christophe

Xen-devel mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>