WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix next->vcpu_dirty_cpumask checking in contex

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix next->vcpu_dirty_cpumask checking in context_switch()
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:29:56 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:28:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There was a timing window where flush_tlb_mask() could be called with
an empty mask (triggering a WARN_ON() in send_IPI_mask_flat() along
with APIC errors) because rather than using the already taken snapshot
of next's vcpu_dirty_cpumask struct vcpu's field was used directly,
which can get its only bit cleared by remote CPUs.

Replacing the structure field's use by the local variable then made the
inner cpus_empty() check completely redundant with the one in the
surrounding if()'s condition.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- 2009-03-27.orig/xen/arch/x86/domain.c       2009-04-20 13:00:16.000000000 
+0200
+++ 2009-03-27/xen/arch/x86/domain.c    2009-04-20 13:03:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -1325,8 +1325,7 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, s
     if ( unlikely(!cpu_isset(cpu, dirty_mask) && !cpus_empty(dirty_mask)) )
     {
         /* Other cpus call __sync_lazy_execstate from flush ipi handler. */
-        if ( !cpus_empty(next->vcpu_dirty_cpumask) )
-            flush_tlb_mask(next->vcpu_dirty_cpumask);
+        flush_tlb_mask(dirty_mask);
     }
 
     if ( is_hvm_vcpu(prev) && !list_empty(&prev->arch.hvm_vcpu.tm_list) )




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix next->vcpu_dirty_cpumask checking in context_switch(), Jan Beulich <=