WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix stubdom memory corruption

To: "bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix stubdom memory corruption
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:55:06 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:55:31 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <945221.68296.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <945221.68296.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505)
Boris Derzhavets wrote:

> This one and vl.c patch have been applied.
> stubdom has been rebuilt and reinstalled.
> No improvement.

Are you sure you correctly build the new code and running fs-backend?
I am only asking this because it is really easy to have this kind of
problems with stubdoms.

If your build and test environments are correct, are there any errors in
the logfiles?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel