|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: imply 'noapic' from 'nolapic'
While in the comments to an earlier submitted (and already applied)
patch I claimed to have fixed the need to specify both "nolapic" and
"noapic" when "nolapic" alone should already have the intended effect,
this doesn't appear to be the case. Here are the missing bits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- 2009-03-27.orig/xen/arch/x86/apic.c 2009-04-02 11:50:24.000000000 +0200
+++ 2009-03-27/xen/arch/x86/apic.c 2009-04-02 11:51:56.000000000 +0200
@@ -1303,8 +1303,10 @@ int __init APIC_init_uniprocessor (void)
if (enable_local_apic < 0)
clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_APIC, boot_cpu_data.x86_capability);
- if (!smp_found_config && !cpu_has_apic)
+ if (!smp_found_config && !cpu_has_apic) {
+ skip_ioapic_setup = 1;
return -1;
+ }
/*
* Complain if the BIOS pretends there is one.
@@ -1313,6 +1315,7 @@ int __init APIC_init_uniprocessor (void)
printk(KERN_ERR "BIOS bug, local APIC #%d not detected!...\n",
boot_cpu_physical_apicid);
clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_APIC, boot_cpu_data.x86_capability);
+ skip_ioapic_setup = 1;
return -1;
}
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: imply 'noapic' from 'nolapic',
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|