WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.28 64-bit domU not booting

To: Valtteri Kiviniemi <valtteri.kiviniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.28 64-bit domU not booting
From: Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:37:54 +0100
Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:41:25 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4961FABF.1020304@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4961FABF.1020304@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Im using vanilla 2.6.28 kernel from kernel.org and when I try to boot my 
>   domU with it, it just disappears without any error or warning.

Just to dig up this old thread: we've been seeing the same thing.  I *think* it
comes down to the NX bit (or the lack thereof); on machines without NX, the
early pagetable setup is trying to use the NX bit in the PTE flags, and the
hypervisor is telling it to go away.  The Red Hat bugzilla entry that I've filed
has more analysis:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492523

Valtteri, can you give the output of "cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags", so we can
confirm that it's probably the same issue?

And it looks like Ian Campbell actually posted a patch upstream
(http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0901.3/02668.html) that should
fix this, but I don't see it in any of the upstream trees.  Ian, Jeremy, do you
guys know what the status is there?  It would be good to get into 2.6.30, and
probably backport to the stable trees as well.

-- 
Chris Lalancette

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>