Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8

[Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>]

With the most recent update i was able to build
kernel with attached .config

CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND=y
CONFIG_XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=y

root@ServerXen331:/usr/src/linux-2.6-xen# git pull
remote: Counting objects: 34, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (19/19), done.
remote: Total 19 (delta 16), reused 0 (delta 0)
Unpacking objects: 100% (19/19), done.
From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen
   ce44abd..10a340b  xen/dom0/hackery -> origin/xen/dom0/hackery
Updating ce44abd..10a340b
Fast forward
 drivers/input/Kconfig |    1 +
 drivers/net/Kconfig   |    2 +-
 drivers/video/Kconfig |    1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Boris

--- On Wed, 3/25/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8
To: "M A Young" <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 1:45 PM

M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, M A Young wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> 
>>> M A Young wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, i've noticed also that after build completed
>>>>> 
>>>>> CONFIG_XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
>>>>> gets reset to "m"
>>>>
 
>>>> I think the attached patch fixes the XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND
configuration dependencies.
>>> 
>>> (This patch was full of ^M's)
>> 
>> That's strange because it wasn't when I sent it. I wonder if
it got mangled in-transit.
>> 
>>> Unfortunately this didn't help me; it still ended up making
this 'm', which doesn't work.  The simple fix is, I think, to make
this a "bool", so it gets built in.  Its not really big enough to
bother with.
>> 
>> I have been using XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND=m on some of my kernels so it
didn't cause me a problem, though of course if any of the dependent modules
were "y" then that would indeed be incorrect. I did have an alternate
way of doing it that I could try.
> 
> I should probably have said that the alternate idea was to remove the
selects, then make XEN_XENBUS_FRONTEND default y and depends
 on
XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND || XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND || XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND ||
XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND

Doesn't scale very well as we add more frontends though.

I don't see a huge benefit in making it separately compilable anyway;
it's pretty small, and I can't think of much plausible use for a Xen
kernel without frontends.  (On the other hand, making all of xenbus a single
module might be useful, so that a non-Xen boot doesn't have to carry it.)

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

kernel-xen1.conf
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel