Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support

Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> I think both should be ok for dom0. Should the driver domain support be 
> considered also now?
>   

I've only given them secondary consideration; keep them in mind, don't
do anything with precludes them from working, but no explicit effort to
make it work. PCI Passthrough is probably more important to keep in mind
(though there'd be a fair amount of overlap, I'd assume).

>> Are you thinking of putting a Xen hook in setup_msi_irq?
>>     
>
> Yes, exactly, I assume it is acceptable for changes under arch/x86/kernel/, 
> like what changes for IOAPIC, am I right?
>   

Yes, it should be OK.

J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support, Jiang, Yunhong Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support, Jiang, Yunhong Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support, Jiang, Yunhong

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] Get DomainU weight, Artur Baruchi

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 38] xen: add more Xen dom0 support, Jiang, Yunhong

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [patch] xend: pass slot for pass-through devices to qemu-xen, Simon Horman

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]