On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 04:12:10PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:53:32PM +0900, Yuji Shimada wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:00:30 +0000
> > David Edmondson <dme@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 26 Feb 2009, at 8:40am, Yuji Shimada wrote:
> > > > I hope developers give me some comments.
> > >
> > > I don't really have an opinion about what happens on Linux.
> > >
> > > The current Solaris IO domain work uses the BDF derived naming for PCI
> > > devices in domain specifications. We have been discussing using
> > > Solaris device paths (such as /pci@0,0/pci8086,3605@2/pci8086,3500@0/
> > > pci8086,3518@2/pci108e,4836@0,1) instead, as it would simplify various
> > > parts of our implementation and administration model.
>
> is there a situation in Solaris where the BDF can change,
> like the situation that Shimada-san has described in Linux?
Across a reboot, yes. Without a reboot, then it looks as though it
might happen in principle, but I've not seen it.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|