|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8
 
I failed to revert commits. Is there any chance to rollback ( git bisect ?) to:-
  commit 43dc5d909d20fc86c4f1cfbec55e78f73f4ffa00 Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> Date:   Wed Mar 18 16:39:11 2009 -0700
      xen/apic: add new parameter for setup_ioapic_entry()          setup_ioapic_entry() now takes the pin as well.          Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
  commit 10a04b072ec4cc877d7c1746cc92c728a3d144b0 Merge: 0ed3109... 6aafa6c...
 
  Boris.
  --- On Sun, 3/22/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 From: Boris Derzhavets
 <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8 To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 4:16 AM
 
 Build was successful without 5 recent commits :-
  ab0d988fcd8fc00eb638cbc65fb4a3196b9e4886 d46ab5a742e9cfab89d72dbae3e2864a5ef1febe 7a9e8bed8a756b1c07a92af20b6276bbe4cb4ed7 bd4a7874716d1b1f69cacfef4adf9f94050ecd82 cfb667260eb7f6dd26ceb6d49da818978396757d
  Boris
  --- On Sun, 3/22/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:
 From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8 To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 3:02 AM
 
 $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-xen $ cd linux-2.6-xen $ git checkout origin/xen/dom0/hackery -b xen/dom0/hackery
  Yes. Same build
 as yesterday just on an other box.
  Boris.
  --- On Sun, 3/22/09, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8 To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date:
 Sunday, March 22, 2009, 12:28 AM
 
 Boris Derzhavets wrote: >   AS       arch/x86/lib/copy_user_nocache_64.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.o >   CC      arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.o >   CC      arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.o >   CC      arch/x86/lib/delay.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/getuser.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o >   CC      arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/memset_64.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/putuser.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/rwlock_64.o >   AS      arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.o >   CC      arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.o >   AR      arch/x86/lib/lib.a >   LD      vmlinux.o >   MODPOST vmlinux.o > WARNING: modpost: Found 3 section mismatch(es). > To see full details build your kernel with: > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' >   GEN     .version >   CHK     
 include/linux/compile.h >   UPD     include/linux/compile.h >   CC      init/version.o >   LD       init/built-in.o >   LD      .tmp_vmlinux1 > drivers/built-in.o: In function `xenbus_register_frontend': > /home/boris/linux-2.6-xen/include/xen/xenbus.h:115: undefined reference to `__xenbus_register_frontend' > /home/boris/linux-2.6-xen/include/xen/xenbus.h:115: undefined reference to `__xenbus_register_frontend' > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > 
  This is xen/dom0/hackery?  Are you using modules for your Xen config?
     J
  _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
    |   
      _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
    |   
      _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
    |  
  
      _______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: Fw: Re: [Xen-devel] tip.git regression from "vsprintf: unify	the format decoding layer for its 3 users", (continued)
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, M A Young
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, Boris Derzhavets
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, M A Young
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, Boris Derzhavets
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, M A Young
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, M A Young
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, Boris Derzhavets
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, M A Young
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Re: [Xen-devel] The most recent attempt to build 2.6.29-rc8, M A Young
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |