|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFO] #2: removing a concurrency bottleneck
On 20/03/2009 08:30, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It should certainly be num_possible_cpus(), which (hopefully) is identical to
> num_present_cpus() until physical CPU hotplug gets supported, in which
> case some infrastructure will need to be added anyway so that your and
> other code could do such per-CPU allocations on demand.
>
> Other than Keir suggested, I'd not recommend adding further NR_CPUS
> sized arrays (based mostly on how long it took to mostly (fully?) get rid of
> them in Linux in order to support huge systems) - just use per-CPU pointers
> to dynamically allocated memory.
Oh yes, that's a better idea! Please do that instead.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|