WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem stub for 3.4

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem stub for 3.4
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Xen-Devel \(E-mail\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:11:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49C26C2F.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The full tmem patch returns -ENODEV if tmem is present and
disabled.  I suppose it makes no difference whether the stub
returns -ENODEV or -ENOSYS, but I'd still like to see
the patch taken to ensure the slot is clearly reserved
and to printk the warning.

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:01 AM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: Keir Fraser; Xen-Devel (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem stub for 3.4
> 
> 
> Why would failing with -ENODEV be more graceful than failing 
> with -ENOSYS?
> In my opinion it just makes eventual compatibility handling 
> slightly more
> convoluted on the kernel side, as it then will require 
> checking for two
> different return codes to distinguish non-fatal from possibly 
> fatal failure.
> 
> Jan
> 
> >>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 19.03.09 15:42 >>>
> After lengthy discussion with Keir and Ian, we agreed that
> it is too close to 3.4 freeze to put in the transcendent memory
> (tmem) patch.  Instead, it will be added as soon as xen-unstable
> unfreezes following 3.4.
> 
> This patch reserves the hypercall number for tmem and
> adds a stub to allow tmem-modified guests to fail gracefully
> on the 3.4 release.
> 
> (Patch also attached in case my mailer messes up the formatting.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff -r 2039e8271051 xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S     Wed Mar 18 17:30:13 2009 +0000
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S     Thu Mar 19 08:31:35 2009 -0600
> @@ -703,6 +703,7 @@ ENTRY(hypercall_table)
>          .long do_sysctl             /* 35 */
>          .long do_domctl
>          .long do_kexec_op
> +        .long do_tmem_op
>          .rept __HYPERVISOR_arch_0-((.-hypercall_table)/4)
>          .long do_ni_hypercall
>          .endr
> @@ -750,6 +751,7 @@ ENTRY(hypercall_args_table)
>          .byte 1 /* do_sysctl            */  /* 35 */
>          .byte 1 /* do_domctl            */
>          .byte 2 /* do_kexec_op          */
> +        .byte 1 /* do_tmem_op           */
>          .rept __HYPERVISOR_arch_0-(.-hypercall_args_table)
>          .byte 0 /* do_ni_hypercall      */
>          .endr
> diff -r 2039e8271051 xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S      Wed Mar 18 
> 17:30:13 2009 +0000
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S      Thu Mar 19 
> 08:31:35 2009 -0600
> @@ -408,6 +408,7 @@ ENTRY(compat_hypercall_table)
>          .quad do_sysctl                 /* 35 */
>          .quad do_domctl
>          .quad compat_kexec_op
> +        .quad do_tmem_op
>          .rept __HYPERVISOR_arch_0-((.-compat_hypercall_table)/8)
>          .quad compat_ni_hypercall
>          .endr
> @@ -455,6 +456,7 @@ ENTRY(compat_hypercall_args_table)
>          .byte 1 /* do_sysctl                */  /* 35 */
>          .byte 1 /* do_domctl                */
>          .byte 2 /* compat_kexec_op          */
> +        .byte 1 /* do_tmem_op               */
>          .rept __HYPERVISOR_arch_0-(.-compat_hypercall_args_table)
>          .byte 0 /* compat_ni_hypercall      */
>          .endr
> diff -r 2039e8271051 xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S     Wed Mar 18 17:30:13 2009 +0000
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S     Thu Mar 19 08:31:35 2009 -0600
> @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ ENTRY(hypercall_table)
>          .quad do_sysctl             /* 35 */
>          .quad do_domctl
>          .quad do_kexec_op
> +        .quad do_tmem_op
>          .rept __HYPERVISOR_arch_0-((.-hypercall_table)/8)
>          .quad do_ni_hypercall
>          .endr
> @@ -739,6 +740,7 @@ ENTRY(hypercall_args_table)
>          .byte 1 /* do_sysctl            */  /* 35 */
>          .byte 1 /* do_domctl            */
>          .byte 2 /* do_kexec             */
> +        .byte 1 /* do_tmem_op           */
>          .rept __HYPERVISOR_arch_0-(.-hypercall_args_table)
>          .byte 0 /* do_ni_hypercall      */
>          .endr
> diff -r 2039e8271051 xen/common/memory.c
> --- a/xen/common/memory.c     Wed Mar 18 17:30:13 2009 +0000
> +++ b/xen/common/memory.c     Thu Mar 19 08:31:35 2009 -0600
> @@ -560,6 +560,19 @@ long do_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN
>      return rc;
>  }
>  
> +/* temporary placeholder for tmem hypercall */
> +int do_tmem_op(void *tmem_op)
> +{
> +    static int warned = 0;
> +
> +    if ( !warned )
> +    {
> +        printk("tmem: not implemented\n");
> +        warned = 1;
> +    }
> +    return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Local variables:
>   * mode: C
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>