|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken
Sven Köhler wrote:
I haven't tested any other pc_ops kernel version. I'm not sure, that it
ever worked with these kernel. Which was the first kernel version, that
had domU support? 2.6.28.0 ?
2.6.27 was the first version with x86-64 domU support.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|
|
|