| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] memory_reservation bug?
On 03/11/09 11:08, Keir Fraser wrote:
On 11/03/2009 17:32, "Mick Jordan" <Mick.Jordan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I've looked at the code in memory.c and page_alloc.c and Xen certainly
thinks tot_pages > max_pages for the domain when it reports the error.
The extent_order on the reservations is 0.
Any ideas?
Just because you called decrease_reservation() doesn't mean the pages
necessarily really got freed. If you still have mappings to them squirrelled
away then the free can be deferred.
Ah, that explains it, thank you. I was taking the fact that the return
value equaled the number I tried to decrease meant that it really did
decrease by that amount. But, owing to a bug, I do in fact have
mappings still lying around.
Xen really does need a developer manual -;)
Mick
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home