WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: xen drivers to use virtio?

To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: xen drivers to use virtio?
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:58:07 -0800
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jun Koi <junkoi2004@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:58:53 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49A7504C.4010506@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <fdaac4d50902250633m712d8252oc78bdf76ab4b598e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A5DA20.2080306@xxxxxxxx> <49A7504C.4010506@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Jun Koi wrote:
If I understand correctly, we are going to rewrite some xen drivers in
Linux kernel to use virtio once virtio is stable. Is that true?

There are no plans to do so.

Actually, they're already there to some degree now that qemu-dm is tracking the upstream QEMU tree. virtio support has been in the QEMU tree for some time now. If it's not enabled in qemu-dm by default, it should be trivial to enable. From Xend's perspective, virtio devices shouldn't be different from either rtl8139, e1000, etc. It's just another PCI device.

This model makes less sense in the context of stub domains, but if you're running qemu-dm in dom0, you may actually get reasonable performance out of the virtio drivers.

In fact, comparing an HVM domain using virtio with qemu-dm in dom0 verses netfront ala PV-on-HVM would make for a very interesting comparison.

And assuming PV-on-HVM isn't in upstream Linux yet (that appears to be the case) and virtio is, it may even be a practical thing to do.

I have some pvhvm changes sitting here waiting for some testing. They're fairly trivial as they completely reuse the existing frontend drivers, so its just some stuff to probe for the Xen magic pci device and route from the pci interrupt back to event channels. So I don't think there's a lot of code saving either way.

That said, it would be interesting to compare guests using direct pv drivers, vs virtio-via-qemu.

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>