|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?
 
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
   
Hm, I hope not.  Doesn't it always end up using set_pte*?
     
 
ptep_get_and_clear_full();
See zap_pte_range() in mm/memory.c
 
 
 Ah, right.  It could be changed to use ptep_modify_prot_start/commit.  
That would make it batchable too.  Slightly less good for native.
   J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
  
  
  
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: pv_ops & gntdev?, Gerd Hoffmann
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |