|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline
>> It should be possible to have the tools do all the PTE manipulations
>> with MMU update hypercalls (I think -- Keir may correct me here). Then
>> the final hypercall to surrender the page will fail if the grant tables
>> are wrong; if it does, put the PTEs back and fall back to a live
>> migration. Isn't that what your in-xen code does anyway?
Tim, after checking the code more carefully, seems currently the MMU update
hypercalls (including mod_lx_entry ) assume it is for current domain, while in
our usage model, it will update MMU for other domain, so I will try to do
following changes: 1) change mod_lx_entry() to get a domain parameter 2) Add a
new hypercall (or a new command to do_mmu_update ) to update the MMU for other
domain. I'm not sure if there are other usage model for such requirement, and
if such changes acceptable? Any feedback is welcome.
Thanks
Yunhong Jiang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Jiang, Yunhong
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Jiang, Yunhong
- [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Jiang, Yunhong
- [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline, Jiang, Yunhong
- [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC][PATCH] Basic support for page offline,
Jiang, Yunhong <=
|
|
|
|
|