Re: [Xen-devel] Porting HYPERVISOR_multicall to HVM

To:	"Kumar, Venkat" <Venkat.Kumar@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Porting HYPERVISOR_multicall to HVM
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:36:45 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:14 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<3D9CB4061D1EB3408D4A0B910433453C02FFA53B6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcmM8xf54Q0Lf+fuQTy0MHEmucdvkQAAlM0m
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Porting HYPERVISOR_multicall to HVM
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119

Just need to make do_multicall_call() HVM aware I think. Apart fromt that probably can use the existing PV multicall entry point directly.

-- Keir

On 12/02/2009 09:20, "Kumar, Venkat" <Venkat.Kumar@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Looks like porting “HYPERVISOR_multicall” to HVM is a straight forward work, Does anybody disagree with this?

Thx,
Venkat

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Porting HYPERVISOR_multicall to HVM