Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel Panic in xen-blkfront.c:blkif_queue_request under 2.6.28

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

Greg Harris wrote:
> After applying the patch we were able to reproduce the panic and the additional 
> debugging output is attached.  The driver appears to re-try the request several 
> times before dying:
>
> Writing inode tables: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:244 do_blkif_request+0x301/0x440()
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28.2-metacarta-appliance-1 #2
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff80240b34>] warn_on_slowpath+0x64/0xa0
>  [<ffffffff80232ae3>] enqueue_task+0x13/0x30
>  [<ffffffff8059be54>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x14/0x20
>  [<ffffffff803c70fc>] get_free_entries+0xbc/0x2a0
>  [<ffffffff804078b1>] do_blkif_request+0x301/0x440
>  [<ffffffff8036fb35>] blk_invoke_request_fn+0xa5/0x110
>  [<ffffffff80407a08>] kick_pending_request_queues+0x18/0x30
>  [<ffffffff80407bb7>] blkif_interrupt+0x197/0x1e0
>  [<ffffffff8026ccd9>] handle_IRQ_event+0x39/0x80
>  [<ffffffff8026f096>] handle_level_irq+0x96/0x120
>  [<ffffffff802140d5>] do_IRQ+0x85/0x110
>  [<ffffffff803c83f5>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0xe5/0x130
>  [<ffffffff80246217>] __do_softirq+0xe7/0x180
>  [<ffffffff8059c65e>] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30
>  <EOI>  [<ffffffff802093aa>] _stext+0x3aa/0x1000
>  [<ffffffff802093aa>] _stext+0x3aa/0x1000
>  [<ffffffff8020de8c>] xen_safe_halt+0xc/0x20
>  [<ffffffff8020c1fa>] xen_idle+0x2a/0x50
>  [<ffffffff80210041>] cpu_idle+0x41/0x70
> ---[ end trace 107c74ebf2b50a63 ]---
> METACARTA: too many segments for ring (11): req->nr_phys_segments = 11
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d00 pfn 379760 off 1536 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d00 pfn 379760 off 2048 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d00 pfn 379760 off 2560 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d00 pfn 379760 off 3072 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d00 pfn 379760 off 3584 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 0 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 512 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 1024 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 1536 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 2048 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 2560 len 512
> METACARTA: 0: bio page ffffe2000c291d38 pfn 379761 off 3072 len 512
>   
(Wonder why the index didn't increment.  Missing ++?)

Well, that's interesting.  I count 12 bios there.  Are we asking for the 
wrong thing, or is the block layer giving us too many bios?
What's the distinction between a bio and a segment?  Also, why are there 
so many pieces.  Our main restriction is that a transfer can't cross a 
page boundary, but we could easily handle this request in two pieces, 
one for each page.  Can we ask the block layer to do that merging?
Thanks,
   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel