|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Replacing IRET by a hypercall
Hello, I am trying to implement a security system using Xen, in which i need to replace the iret instruction by a hypercall so that the control comes to xen before going back to user-space process so that i can perform some security checks.
I am trying to replace each iret in linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/arch/i386/kernel/entry-xen.S with my hypercall. I check the cs for privilege level of return code. If it is ring 2/3 then i execute my hypercall else normal iret instruction is executed.
1: pushl %eax movl $0,%eax movw 8(%esp),%ax testl $2,%eax jz 678f testl $1,vmcloak_on jz 678f jmp hypercall_page + (__HYPERVISOR_debug_iret * 32)
678: popl %eax iret This code is added at all four places just before iret is called in entry-xen.S
In the file xen-3.3.0/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S at the point ENTRY(hypercall), I check the contents of %eax with my hypercall number which is 38. If my hypercall is made, I replace the stack contents of ring 0 with those of ring 1 so that hardware performs normal iret i.e. control goes back normally to the user mode process had the hypercall not been made.
I am assuming the stack contents of ring 1 to be as follows: ________ | ss | | esp | | eflags | | cs | | eip | | eax | ** This is pushed so that the value of eax is preserved across hypercall.
Ring 1 stack
I am assuming the stack contents of ring 0 to be as follows:
________
| ss |
| esp |
| eflags |
| cs |
| eip |
Ring 0 stack
The code added in entry.S after ENTRY(hypercall) is as follows: cli cmpl $38,%eax jne 679f movw 16(%esp),%gs movl 12(%esp),%esi
/************************ Moving EIP ***********************************/
movl %gs:4(%esi),%eax movl %eax,(%esp)
/************************ CS *******************************************/ movl %gs:8(%esi),%eax movl %eax,4(%esp)
/*********************** EFLAGS *************************************/
movl %gs:12(%esi),%eax movl %eax,8(%esp)
/*********************** ESP *************************************/ movl %gs:16(%esi),%eax movl %eax,12(%esp)
/*********************** SS **************************************/
movl %gs:20(%esi),%eax movl %eax,16(%esp)
/************************Restoring eax*****************************/ movl %gs:(%esi),%eax iret
679: // remaining code of ENTRY(hypercall)
Are my assumptions correct? I am unable to understand whether this code is correct. Can you please tell me the mistakes that I might be making.
Please help me,
Furquan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] Replacing IRET by a hypercall,
Furquan Shaikh <=
|
|
|
|
|