WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU console buffer behaviour

To: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: domU console buffer behaviour
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:00:14 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:00:53 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87abae5t8p.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclqXQcTRnF8O/t0b0KmQA65Swiz5w==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: domU console buffer behaviour
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
On 30/12/2008 01:47, "Ferenc Wagner" <wferi@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Anyway, I'll look at this some more tomorrow.  I wonder why
> xenconsoled on a machine running lots of VMs isn't much bigger (as VSZ
> in ps output) than on another running nothing but dom0.  Isn't this
> 1 MB/VM allocated by xenconsoled?

I'm not sure if merely malloc()ing 1MB adds that to VSZ, or if the memory
also has to be written to, which it may not have entirely been for every
domain.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>