WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Guest time and TSCs since changeset 17716

To: Frank Van Der Linden <Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Guest time and TSCs since changeset 17716
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:35:45 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:36:13 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <495907A8.1080909@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Aclp2+D5hnsH4hHiEEqXlhtufqz2xw==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Guest time and TSCs since changeset 17716
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119


On 29/12/2008 17:23, "Frank Van Der Linden" <Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Changeset 17716 provides monotonically increasing guest time for HVM
> domains, by using the per-domain pl_time structure. hvm_get_guest_time
> and hvm_set_guest_time were changed to use this. Previously, the guest
> time was stored directly in the TSC offset fields of the vmx/smv control
> structures.
> 
> Since pt_freeze_time and pt_thaw_time use hvm_get/set_guest_time, they
> now no longer freeze TSC time for a guest. So, for timer_mode 0, TSC
> time is no longer frozen when a VCPU is not running. Unless you're using
> opt_softtsc, in which TSC exactly tracks the per-domain values.
> 
> I have no love for timer_mode 0 (it has serious issues on SMP), but was
> this change intentional? Or am I perhaps missing something?

It sounds unintentional, but as you say no one really uses timer_mode 0 so I
suppose it's gone unnoticed so far.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>