Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?

Jun Koi wrote:

>> /* window on the host screen, opengl acceleration */
>> sdl=1 opengl=1 vnc=0
>>
> 
> OK, and this gives us the best performance.

Yes.

> 
> So I understand that if your patches to QEMU are merged, QEMU/KVM
> would get much better graphical performance. Excellent! Did you
> benchmark to see how much it is better? Any number?
> 

Yes, but don't hold your breath, qemu people didn't seem very interested
in this.
It is difficult to get any significant number, but I can tell you that
at least you can get window resizing for free, not to mention many
possible further improvements.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Jun Koi Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Stefano Stabellini Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Jun Koi Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Stefano Stabellini Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Jun Koi Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Stefano Stabellini <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-research] Re: [Xen-devel] Implementing split memory in Xen is annoyingly hard?, Tim Deegan

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Disabling cirrus-vga, Stefano Stabellini

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] opengl=1?, Jun Koi

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [Patch] fix rom_scan, Akio Takebe

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]