|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support
On 10/12/2008 17:01, "Espen Skoglund" <espen.skoglund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Ahh, yes, I didn't realize this. So how do you think changing it to
>> spinlock, since it is not performance ciritical. Or do you know how
>> much benifit for read_lock?
>
> It may not be performance critical, but I don't particularly like
> seeing big global locks introduced. By the looks of it this lock
> would also protect everything related to interrupt management.
A global lock on control-plane operations such as add/remove/assign seems
okay to me. On data path operations such as interrupt handlers then
obviously not.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Espen Skoglund
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Espen Skoglund
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Espen Skoglund
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Espen Skoglund
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re-enable MSI support, Jiang, Yunhong
|
|
|
|
|