Re: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg

To:	James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:25:57 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:26:24 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0154FE9B@trantor>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AclV/lKvEK9muFj+TqyYAs0a02NrBAAAM1nBAAAIa6AAAPR0pQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024

On 04/12/2008 11:01, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> Does the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg go with xen-3.3-testing.hg or
>>> xen-unstable.hg?
>>> 
>> 
>> Both, since we don't do synced stable releases of the Linux port.
> 
> Is the current state of linux-2.6.18-xen.hg considered stable enough for
> production use?

Yes, the rate of code churn in that repository is fairly low.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg, James Harper Re: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg, Keir Fraser RE: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg, James Harper Re: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg, Keir Fraser <=

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] linux-2.6.18-xen.hg