[Xen-devel] one question to PHYSDEVOP_manage_pci_remove

To:	Espen Skoglund <espen.skoglund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] one question to PHYSDEVOP_manage_pci_remove
From:	"Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:56:02 +0800
Accept-language:	en-US
Acceptlanguage:	en-US
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:56:28 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AclPFlEZT4KUwyIqRomRFcOaJpinJw==
Thread-topic:	one question to PHYSDEVOP_manage_pci_remove

Hi, Espen, when I'm working on the MSI lock issue, I have one question to 
PHYSDEVOP_manage_pci_remove. From the kernel, seems it will happen for PCI 
device remove. Is it target only for pci hotplug?
I asked this because I noticed that in current code, it will always clear the 
VT-d entry, no matter if the device is owned by other domain, I'm not sure if 
it reqiures the device is not owned by a guest (maybe except dom0).

Thanks
Yunhong Jiang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] one question to PHYSDEVOP_manage_pci_remove