|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: The memory type of non-RAM address is WB by default?
Hi Keir/Dexuan,
Attached the patch, which only checks the conflict in RAM range.
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 23/10/08 11:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> Well, one approach would be not to warn! :-)
>>>
>>> Seriously: for anything which is not guest RAM, the host should
>>> really know best what memory type it should be mapped as (probably
>>> UC or WC). Hence why mess around validating a guest-requested memory
>>> type?
>> This method looks good. I'll try to make a patch.
>
> Thanks. I agree this is probably the best approach.
>
> -- Keir
Best Regards,
Disheng, Su
check_ram_address_only.patch
Description: check_ram_address_only.patch
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] RE: The memory type of non-RAM address is WB by default?,
Su, Disheng <=
|
|
|
|
|