WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] bridge + arp

To: Moritz Möller <m.moeller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] bridge + arp
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:10:09 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:10:23 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <122AA196D7CE4E4DBB92911EF4AB5AB38462F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Ackaibd2x6RUc2hATrStZ9Z1KWttUgADE4AQABiRsfE=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] bridge + arp
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122


On 19/9/08 21:27, "Moritz Möller" <m.moeller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> By the way - We're not using the netloop driver, i.e. we only have eth0,
> br0 and the vifN with N>=1.
> 
> What is the reason behind the vethN<->vif0.N thing?

netloop isn't usually required any more. The problem it solved has been
addressed by other means.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>