This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check

To: steven maresca <steve.maresca@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:02:22 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:02:45 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <af7d04000809180942g65edb896pbc3a1363ea79bbd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <af7d04000809180942g65edb896pbc3a1363ea79bbd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20080723)
steven maresca wrote:
> In testing the 2.6.27-rc6 kernel, I at one point neglected to enable
> SMP, and encountered the same issue as described in the following thread
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/31/115 (to which you replied with a hint
> toward a confirmed workaround).
> I don't have any issues running a SMP kernel; just wondering whether
> a) it's easily fixed or b) if UP should be avoided? Do you need more
> debug information?

The fix for this should already be in Linus's git tree, or it will be
soon.  There's no big downside to running an SMP kernel anyway though.


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>