WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] c/s 18470

>>> "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> 18.09.08 09:39 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Likewise the calls to cpufreq_{add,del}_cpu() from the CPU hot(un)plug
>> paths seem to consider the Intel case only (as the functions
>> themselves are Intel specific).
>
>[Jinsong]:
>  Not quite sure about your question. I just check the code:
>  1. cpufreq_add/del_cpu() is arch-independent, since all arch-dependent
>part has been handled by cpufreq_driver->init/exit().
>  2. cpu online/offline path is also arch-independent.
>  Would you please tell me more clear where is intel specific?

In that platform_hypercall.c calls cpufreq_add_cpu() only for Intel CPUs,
but the hotplug code calls it and cpufreq_del_cpu() always. This ought
to be consistent I believe.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>