| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] CPU online/offline support in Xen
|
To: |
Gavin Maltby <Gavin.Maltby@xxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] CPU online/offline support in Xen |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:48:45 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
Frank Van Der Linden <Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:49:11 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<48C6515B.9080103@xxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AckSaaGr4AGTJn5cEd2WrgAX8io7RQ== |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] CPU online/offline support in Xen |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 9/9/08 11:35, "Gavin Maltby" <Gavin.Maltby@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> You can hardly expect to do work in private and then 'surface the submarine'
>> when others post patches and expect them to do the work to merge with you.
>> If Intel's patches look acceptable then they will be checked in and Sun will
>> have to do the merge work to get any extra enhancements or features in their
>> patchset to work on top. That is unless you can see strong reason why Sun's
>> patches are technically better.
>
> Agreed. Sun and Intel have exchanged a few loose emails on our intentions
> in this area, but no close coordination. We (Sun) aren't expecting
> to try to contribute ours as patches to xen-unstable straight-away
> as we have a broader project to float first, and we also have to
> take our 3.1.4-based work up to the xen-unstable base. So by
> all means take in the Intel patch - we have no objections
> (although we might feel differently when next our base is
> updated to a later Xen release!). I've asked the author of the
> Sun work to have a look at this proposed patch to see how it
> fits with our work.
Sounds good to me!
Cheers,
Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home