This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984)

To: 'Keir Fraser' <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984)
From: "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:44:32 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:45:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4E7037E.26D30%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <76780B19A496DC4B80439008DAD7076C01806EE809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4E7037E.26D30%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AckPY1b+54L+SkwhTiiH15sBGx6AyQAAgqWRAIMXnAA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984)
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 5/9/08 15:26, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> All,
>> This is our test report for Xen-3.2.2-rc4 (#16984). One new bug was
>> found, and old bug #1313 got fixed.
>> New Issue:
>> ==============================================
>> 1. with qcow image, it's failed to save/restore a hvm guest with
>> cdrom. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1344
> The new tip of xen-3.2-testing (changeset 16985) is a patch from Intel
> presumably to fix this very issue. It would be good if you could test
> that changeset (I may not bother to do another release candidate) and
> we will release next week if it tests as all okay for you, and we get
> no other bad reports.
>  -- Keir

Keir, it is fixed by c/s 16985. So all of our cases can get pass now. thanks.

-- haicheng

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>