This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] xen: pv domain builder.

Gerd Hoffmann writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] xen: pv 
domain builder."):
> 02 -> 04  Make sense if you want to *test* the patches without merging
>           with upstream qemu before.  For *merging* the patches I'd
>           suggest to merge from upstream qemu instead, then wait for
>           me rebasing the patchset (and dropping these patches).


> 05 -> 06  backend core.
> 07        switches the console to the new backend core.
> 08        xenfb.c -> xen_framebuffer.c rename.
> 09        switch framebuffer to new backend core.

Thanks for the explanation.

> 05 + 06 alone are not useful as nobody uses the new backend core then.
> Merging 07 too gives at least one user.  08+09 going in gives a second
> user.  They are a nice cleanup and certainly make sense for
> qemu-xen-unstable.

That looks like I'll want to take 05-07 and 09.  As previously
discussed, I don't intend to take 08, at least at this stage, and I
would very strongly prefer that 08 didn't go upstream.


Xen-devel mailing list