On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:49:05PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:31:49PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> I'll try to enumerate the scenarios here...
> >>> On KVM, using Xenner + shell : No special args
> >>> On KVM, using Xenner + libvirtd : -xen-create <domid>
> >> This is "xen emulation" and (according to long term plan plan) doesn't
> >> require kvm but should work with qemu emulating things too. This means
> >> it doesn't depend on kvm, you can do that with xen underneath too. This
> >> is what the -xen-emulate switch is good for.
> > Wouldn't the non-KVM case already be dealt with by the -no-kvm command
> > line arg to QEMU ?
> But when running on xen we want being able to qemu tell it should *not*
> use the xen hypervisor but emulate things, thus -xen-emulate.
Oh, i see what you mean. Existing naming practice would suggest naming
it -no-xenhv or just -no-xen
All these '-no-XXX' args are getting a little silly though. I'd rather
tell QEMU what I *do* want, than what I don't want. A generic arg
'-accelerator none|xen|kvm|kqemu' might be worth considering in the future.
That can be a separate discussion from these patches though - we should
just follow the -no-XXX naming for now to minimize diffs
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
Xen-devel mailing list