WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Test report for Xen-3.3.0-rc4 (#18314)

To: "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Test report for Xen-3.3.0-rc4 (#18314)
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:48:09 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:48:36 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <DB3BD37E3533EE46BED2FBA80995557F019D0466@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acj9GE3rwozhsAPLQzWzjoCOtOVTDgABplJuAAGfavAAARduSgAFQpugAAUzSGA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Test report for Xen-3.3.0-rc4 (#18314)
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 13/8/08 13:25, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Both backtraces are from 3.3.0-rc1. You modified and tested
>> the wrong tree.
>> :-) This second backtrace can no longer happen.
>> 
>> We're going to dig into the OOS bug a bit and decide what to do...
> 
> Oh, Sorry, I made a mistake. Thanks for your pointing out.
> I will try rc4 to see if any issue still exists after this modification
> and send you the update.

As of c/s 18326 I've not been able to reproduce the hypervisor crash in
around 40 attempts. Could you give that a go (don't remove OOS from
SHADOW_OPTIMIZATIONS -- just test the tree as it is)?

 Thanks,
 Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel