WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?

To: Ward Vandewege <ward@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:14:11 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:14:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080808150957.GA24893@localdomain>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acj5aWkWp4CJ5GVcEd2xugAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 8/8/08 16:09, "Ward Vandewege" <ward@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is likely a coreboot bug, so I'll have to track that down. Any
> information about differences between what 3.2.1 and 3.1.4 require to be
> kexec'ed into would be most helpful though.

If you specify no-real-mode in both cases then there should be no
difference. If Xen does not drop back into real mode then it cannot make use
of any legacy BIOS services.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel