WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] differences in hvm save/restore in 3.1 vs 3.2

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] differences in hvm save/restore in 3.1 vs 3.2
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 00:07:41 -0700
Cc: Christopher Head <chead@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:08:03 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0148FCD8@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chead@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <486DC98C.2050506@xxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0148FCD8@trantor>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-07-01)
On Friday, 04 July 2008 at 17:03, James Harper wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > There's a bug in the serial port emulation in qemu related to saving
> and
> > restoring. There's a patch floating around somewhere which fixes it,
> but
> > depending on what source tree you're using you may not have it yet.
> One
> > of the critical registers isn't saved and also isn't regenerated at
> > restore time, meaning that serial port interrupts stop getting
> delivered
> > to the guest properly.
> > 
> 
> That sounds like the sort of problem I'm seeing. It's obviously a
> regression though as it was working in 3.1.
> 
> I'm using the Debian provided 3.2 packages but can easily apply a patch
> if I can find it... I'll go searching tonight.

It's probably this one:

http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg/rev/13e10678e714


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel