| 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	ab
 
| 
To:  | 
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:05:30 -0700 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>,	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx,	LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:05:57 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<20080620195620.GA20183@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<alpine.LFD.1.10.0806181723400.2907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<4859AA47.2020903@xxxxxxxx>	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0806181743390.2907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0806182050470.2907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20080619115832.GM15228@xxxxxxx>	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0806190928100.2907@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20080619164708.GA32190@xxxxxxx>	<20080620101028.GA23664@xxxxxxx> <485BFFC4.3070902@xxxxxxxx>	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0806201211560.3167@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20080620195620.GA20183@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) | 
 
 
 
Ingo Molnar wrote:
 
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
   
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
     
Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
       
 Yeah, I was a bit worried about that. Gcc sometimes does insane 
things.
 We literally just tested that the asm should only _ever_ be generated 
with a constant value, but if some gcc dead-code removal thing doesn't 
work, it will then screw up and try to generate the asm even for a 
non-constant thing.
 The fairly trivial fix is probably to just change the "i" to "ir", 
safe in the knowledge that any _sane_ case will never use the "r" 
possibility. I suspect even your insane case will end up then killing 
the bad choice later.
    
 
 okay - Jeremy, could you try the fix below? (or tip/master, i just 
pushed this out)
   
 
Hm.  On 32-bit I get these, but they're warnings.  On 64-bit they're errors.
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1609: Warning: using `%dl' instead of `%edx' due to `b' 
suffix
vs
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:20511: Error: Incorrect register `%eax' used with `b' 
suffix
 (i dont use gcc 3.x myself to build the kernel, had way too many 
miscompilations in randconfig tests in the past.)
  
 
I do it mainly to pick up these kinds of problems.
 
        Ingo
-------------->
commit b68b80b8ab39c42707dc126c41e87d46edc97c27
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jun 20 21:50:20 2008 +0200
    x86, bitops: make constant-bit set/clear_bit ops faster, gcc workaround
    
    Jeremy Fitzhardinge reported this compiler bug:
    
    Suggestion from Linus: add "r" to the input constraint of the
    set_bit()/clear_bit()'s constant 'nr' branch:
    
    Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
    
     CC      init/main.o
    include2/asm/bitops.h: In function `start_kernel':
    include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match 
constraints
    include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match 
constraints
    include2/asm/bitops.h:59: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match 
constraints
    include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
    include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
    include2/asm/bitops.h:59: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
    
    Reported-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
index 6c50548..4575de4 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline void set_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile unsigned 
long *addr)
        if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
                asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0"
                        : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
-                       : "i" (CONST_MASK(nr))
+                       : "ir" (CONST_MASK(nr))
                        : "memory");
        } else {
                asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "bts %1,%0"
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long 
*addr)
        if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
                asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0"
                        : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
-                       : "i" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
+                       : "ir" (~CONST_MASK(nr)));
        } else {
                asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "btr %1,%0"
                        : BITOP_ADDR(addr)
  
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, (continued)
 
- Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Message not available
 - Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Ingo Molnar
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Ingo Molnar
 
- Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Ingo Molnar
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Ingo Molnar
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Ingo Molnar
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
 
- Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction abstraction, Ingo Molnar
 
- Message not available
 - Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - Message not available
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a	ptep_modify_prot	transaction	abstraction, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4] xen: add mechanism to extend existing	multicalls, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for	ptep_modify_prot_start/commit, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 |  
  
 | 
    |