| 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Power aware credit scheduler
 
| 
To:  | 
"Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
RE: [Xen-devel] Power aware credit scheduler | 
 
| 
From:  | 
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:11:47 +0800 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yu,	Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:12:39 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<C47FD2CA.1A104%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<D470B4E54465E3469E2ABBC5AFAC390F024D944E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<C47FD2CA.1A104%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
AcjRyDPly+hYayDgSN6PPLduSJGRXQAFliV6AADKXQAAAIWp8wAABJpA | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] Power aware credit scheduler | 
 
 
 
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2008年6月19日 16:10
>On 19/6/08 09:03, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> Does it then make sense to have the scheduler react to
>>> governor? Sounds like it could be a weird feedback loop.
>>> 
>> 
>> Good suggestion. We're considering adding some more inputs from
>> key components into on-demand governor, instead of simply polling
>> busy ratio for freq change in a fixed interval. For example, when one
>> cpu pulls vcpu from other runqueues, it's the indicator that 
>its current
>> freq may not fit and it's better to scale to max immediately instead
>> of waiting for next 20ms check timer. Other indicators like 
>interrupt,
>> event, etc. You kick a good instance. :-)
>
>I see. This specific example doesn't sound unreasonable. I suppose
>experimental data will show what works and what doesn't.
>
Yes, and we'll start some experiment soon. Will let you know once we
get some concrete data.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    |