|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte	read-modify-writ
 
| 
To:  | 
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte	read-modify-write abstraction | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Sat, 24 May 2008 21:44:25 +0100 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>,	kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>,	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Sat, 24 May 2008 13:45:22 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<alpine.LFD.1.10.0805241022210.3081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<patchbomb.1211552448@localhost>	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0805231133130.3081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<48372C2F.1090704@xxxxxxxx>	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0805241022210.3081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) | 
 
 
 
Linus Torvalds wrote:
 
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
   
Well, you could use it to update the page and protection bits while preserving
the AD bits, but I don't think that's very useful.
     
 
 It's not that it's not "very useful" - it's that it would be TOTALLY 
WRONG.
  
 
 Sorry, I was using ironic understatement.  I meant "...while preserving 
the AD bits, but I think that would be totally fucking stupid".
   J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |