|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: hvm vpt lock strangeness
Agreed, for those timer modes which are aiming for domain-wide monotonicity.
Which is most of the new ones and also all the ones that you guys use in
your product.
-- Keir
On 23/5/08 23:39, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, thanks. So a per-vcpu list lock and a separate
> per-domain monotonicity lock are unfortunately both
> necessary (in my patch).
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
>> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:39 PM
>> To: dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx; Xen-Devel (E-mail)
>> Cc: Dave Winchell
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: hvm vpt lock strangeness
>>
>>
>> Locking is required to prevent multiple concurrent access to a single
>> periodic timer. This is actually implemented at vcpu
>> granularity to avoid
>> lock juggling in functions which walk lists of timers. Since
>> those lists are
>> held per-vcpu, the convenient locking scope is the vcpu.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>> On 23/5/08 21:27, "Dan Magenheimer"
>> <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Noticed this a few days ago while working on the hvm-guest-time
>>> on xen-system-time patch, but forgot about it...
>>>
>>> Throughout xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpt.c, there are uses of a spinlock
>>> called tm_lock. But it appears that this spinlock is declared
>>> and used as part of a per-vcpu data structure. So is this
>>> somehow protecting against vcpu re-entrancy (didn't think that
>>> could happen) or is it supposed to be locking out one vcpu
>>> against another (and not doing the job because each vcpu has
>>> a separate lock)? Or am I misunderstanding something entirely?
>>>
>>> If this should be a domain-wide lock, I'll spin a patch.
>>> (And it might explain some of the weirder time problems?)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> ===================================
>>> Thanks... for the memory
>>> I really could use more / My throughput's on the floor
>>> The balloon is flat / My swap disk's fat / I've OOM's in store
>>> Overcommitted so much
>>> (with apologies to the late great Bob Hope)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|