WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17702 & Xen0: #559 -- nonew iss

To: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17702 & Xen0: #559 -- nonew issue
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 09:51:01 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 23 May 2008 01:51:41 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C45C42B2.21225%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Aci8nAMmHt/Ie4mmT9iQiMEDjqnwXAADhxqjAABGt1AAANhIlwAAMZhQAAB9DFYAADKEyg==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17702 & Xen0: #559 -- nonew issue
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
One thought: in c/s 17690 Xin Xiaohui fixed superpage shattering in EPT
tables. Could there be a similar bug relating to superpage shattering in the
ordinary (non-EPT) p2m logic?

 -- Keir

On 23/5/08 09:45, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Okay, I have failed to repro this issue, but my test machine does not have
> 4G of memory, so I created a low-memory/high-memory split by placing the
> start of the MMIO 'hole' at 256MB rather than the usual 3.75GB. Doing this,
> for a 512MB Linux guest, did not cause the guest to crash. So I guess either
> you really do need to give the guest >4GB of RAM (i.e., it's not a
> split-across-the-MMIO-hole bug) and/or it's related to usage of EPT?
> 
> At least it looks like this one is not *my* bug. :-)
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> On 23/5/08 09:37, "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Keir, 
>>     I think the problem may be not in the tools side, but in the shadow side.
>> I ever removed the shadow 2MB superpage support code in p2m.c, and the Linux
>> guest (hap=0, using shadow) can boot successful with more than 4G memory.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> -- Dongxiao
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 2008年5月23日 16:26
>> To: Xu, Dongxiao; Li, Haicheng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17702 & Xen0: #559 -- nonew
>> issue
>> 
>> That means I broke memory allocation when I cleaned up the tools side of
>> that patch. I will look into it and fix it.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
>> 
>> On 23/5/08 09:06, "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi, Keir, 
>>>     This issue is caused by the 2MB superpage patch in Xen C/S 17645. It
>>> seems
>>> that any linux guest (hap=0, using shadow) with more than 4G memory will
>>> fail
>>> to boot (4095M memory can boot successful). I haven't tried EPT guest.
>>> 
>>> -- Dongxiao
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
>>> Sent: 2008年5月23日 15:54
>>> To: Li, Haicheng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17702 & Xen0: #559 --
>>> nonew
>>> issue
>>> 
>>> On 23/5/08 07:12, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Old issues:
>>>> ==============================================
>>>> 1. linux guest kernel panic when booting up with 4G memory.
>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1255
>>> 
>>> Can you provide more info on this one? Linux version, configuration, etc?
>>> And/or send me the vmlinux/bzImage files privately to try to repro.
>>> 
>>>  -- Keir
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel