|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3
 
| 
To:  | 
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx>,	"Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3 | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Thu, 15 May 2008 12:51:35 +0100 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang,	Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Thu, 15 May 2008 04:52:15 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<DD74FBB8EE28D441903D56487861CD9D2E6B9C14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
Aciwyj3GC5kFZyVcS9eJk6QW6cxy6gAO58GAAASSNxAAAQ9pEAAnjI9gAAQtZQAA9rPlAAAFlo6tABrTxrAADZF8SQAIt2zQAABHtIg= | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3 | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 | 
 
 
 
On 15/5/08 12:45, "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The 'pause' state visible to tools is a specific type of
>> domain_pause(), and
>> *has* to be entered via the pause domctl hypercall. So don't worry --
>> your new type of pause should stack on top of 'xm pause/unpause' no
> problem.
> 
> In fact, does the S3 suspended guest need to go into a pause state at
> all? Presumably we could just let it block?
> Xend does need to be able to know when the S3 suspend has actually
> happened -- there should probably be a VIRQ for this.
S3 suspend is enacted by an I/O port write from the guest, trapped by qemu,
so the final reset of machine state is synchronously triggered by the tools
anyway.
As for pause-vs-block I think this is just a matter of terminology. At the
end of the day we want the domain to not run until s3-resume is triggered.
The natural way to do this within the hypervisor is to maintain a per-domain
is_s3_suspended flag and domain_[un]pause() when this flag toggles.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Yu, Ke
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3,
Keir Fraser <=
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
 
    
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Yu, Ke
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |