|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity
On 21/4/08 20:26, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since my system is 3.0 Ghz, HPET read averages on the order of
> 3 usec, which is what my previous measure showed.
>
> I suspect that Dave's measurements and mine are "both right"
> and that read overhead of HPET varies on different systems.
That would make sense. HPET accesses have to go all the way to the
southbridge, and that's bound to vary a lot between chipsets let alone
across the very different interconnect topologies of AMD vs Intel.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, (continued)
Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- RE: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Dave Winchell
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Keir Fraser
- RE: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [xen-devel] System time monotonicity,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Fix for get_s_time(), Dave Winchell
|
|
|
|
|