|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: [RFC] Remove the x86 Periodic 100HZ PIT Timer	Interrupt
 
Andi Kleen wrote:
> "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> * How to handle platform timer counter overflow
>> Since IBM cyclone timer/HPET timer/ACPI PM timer has large overflow
>> period (> 1s),
> 
> ACPI PM timers are often only 24 bit and overflow in less the 5
> seconds. If you aim for longer sleep times using ACPI PM is not a
> good idea 
> 
> -Andi
> 
This proposal aims for longer processor C state residency, usually it is
in ms. Take native linux kernel as example, when tickless idle is not
enabled, the C state residency is usually less than 10ms. When tickless
idle is enabled, I can see C state residency as long as 50ms sometimes.
So 5s overflow period is long enough in terms of C state residency. 
Best Regards
Ke
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
Message not available
- [Xen-devel] RE: [RFC] Remove the x86 Periodic 100HZ PIT Timer	Interrupt,
Yu, Ke <=
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |