WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Disabling lapic and apic: pitfalls?

To: "dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Disabling lapic and apic: pitfalls?
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:49:06 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:50:18 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080314115521453.00000003604@djm-pc>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciF/JC0bL6Vmok5QrSmQN41YSf2hwAB4OsY
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Disabling lapic and apic: pitfalls?
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
APIC is required for multiprocessor HVM guests. It can be lived without for
UP guests.

 -- Keir

On 14/3/08 17:55, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Excuse my newbie-ness in this area... I hope the answers aren't
> too obvious or widely known.
> 
> What are the disadvantages of disabling the LAPIC and APIC in a
> Linux virtual machine?  What functionality is lost?  What class
> of potential bugs might arise (or go away)?
> 
> Does the answer differ for hvm vs pvm?
> 
> Does the answer differ depending on whether the platform
> underlying is Intel or AMD? 32-bit vs 64-bit?
> 
> Does the answer differ for vcpus=1 vs vcpus>1 (assuming CONFIG_SMP)
> 
> (And what about for Windows of various flavors?)
> 
> For example, I can see that if lapic is enabled, an extra 1000
> interrupts per second are delivered to the VM (250 for pvm).
> Are these useful for anything?  Or are they just eating VM cycles?
> 
> I suspect that disabled apic may break driver domains or pci
> passthrough.  True?  What about lapic?
> 
> I ask all these questions because I often see problem responses of
> the type "Try apic=0" or "Boot with noapic" and I wonder about the
> side effects of such a cure.  Or whether the cure should be
> universally applied for VMs: Depending on the answers to the
> above questions, perhaps the default should be off and we
> should be saying "Try apic=1 if you need that functionality".
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
> 
> ===================================
> If Xen could save time in a bottle / then clocks wouldn't virtually skew /
> It would save every tick / for VMs that aren't quick /
> and Xen then would send them anew
> (with apologies to the late great Jim Croce)
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>